According to Chandra (2007), there are two aspects to globalization, the positive and negative. The negative side to globalization is the vast increase in destruction of the global environment by many global corporations. This is a result of the expansion of trade across international borders, made possible by globalization. It has its adverse effects on the surroundings such as deforestation, inappropriate waste disposal and air pollution.
However, with globalisation also comes positive influences such as the media and activist who are prominent in raising awareness of such environmental degradation. With the latest advanced technology and resources, the message of such harmful acts of corporations can be heard by many global citizens instantly and spark them to start making a change within their own capabilities.
But, environmental activists and help from people all over the world are just not enough to combat this situation. The help from governments are crucial in playing a deciding factor as to whether the target and goals of the UN can be achieved. This can only be acquired if they decide to slow down their economic growth in order to pursue environmental restoration, which is an opportunity cost to them.
Hi Leah!
ReplyDeleteI especially liked that your summary included causes and effects of globalization. This helps me see why globalization is such a big deal with regards to both the good and bad.
Your summary also succinctly laid out the dilemma of international governances: to pursue "economic growth" or "environmental restoration" as an "opportunity cost" to one another.
Nice work!
Thanks, Leah, for the hard work. I have to assume that this is your final draft as well. I hope that's okay since I've already evaluated it.
ReplyDelete